Carmel Church Day 10

20120801-194710.jpg

Today we continued trying to isolate the larger bones we’ve found over the last few days. This is a slow process at Carmel Church, because there are always so many small bones and teeth that turn up in the way. For example, while digging trenches Tim removed a shell fragment from the sea turtle Syllomus (above) while Courtland found the tiny fish vertebra shown below.

20120801-194738.jpg

I had the same problem (if you can consider too many bones a problem), and had to take time to remove this small shark vertebra:

20120801-195036.jpg

One of the things we’re trying to trench around is the skull fragment we found yesterday. Here’s that area as it looked late in the afternoon:

20120801-195313.jpg

And here’s the marked up version:

20120801-195455.jpg

Blue is the skull fragment, red are other whale bones, and green are unidentified bones (which I think are all fish).

We’ve learned quite a lot about this bone today, starting with the fact that it is, indeed, part of a skull. The skull is upside down, so we can see both occipital condyles and part of the basioccipital, with at least one low basioccipital crest. The size of the crest makes me think this is a mysticete rather than an odontocete. It’s quite small for a mysticete, comparable in size to “Blossom“, so it’s not out of the question that this could be another baby. It appears that the rest of the skull is missing; at least we haven’t found more of it yet. In fact, there’s a rib or some other bone jammed into the periotic fossa, where the earbones should be sitting.

We made another interesting discovery today. As we followed the bones into the wall, there was a small patch of weathered Calvert Formation that we had bypassed. This morning we removed that patch, just to make sure we hadn’t missed anything, and found two small odontocete vertebrae:

20120801-200330.jpg

20120801-200402.jpg

If you’ve been following us the whole trip, you may recall that we found three small odontocete vertebrae last week. Those three, plus the two today, were all found within a few inches of each other, and all have about the same centra diameters (allowing for the fact that they’re not consecutive, and that the atlas doesn’t have a centrum). Moreover, the small lower jaw fragment we recovered a few days ago was found less than a foot away.

Maybe they are from one animal, maybe it’s a chance association. But none of these elements is particularly common at Carmel Church, and these were all found in very close proximity to one another.

I’m just sayin’…

About these ads
This entry was posted in Carmel Church mysticetes, Carmel Church odontocetes, Carmel Church Osteichthyans, Carmel Church Quarry, Carmel Church reptiles, Chesapeake Group. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Carmel Church Day 10

  1. umebooks says:

    where were the odontocete found – between the skull frag and the mix where Tim and I were working?

  2. altondooley says:

    Closer than that, just a few inches from the mandible, toward the front of the pit.

  3. George says:

    Butch great finds The shark centrom is hard to identify unless there are teeth associated with it, You can get it maybe down to the family level

  4. George says:

    That fish vert looks like a pipe fish vert at Lee Creek Check the SI pub on bony fish remains

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s