Badlands National Park, Part 4: lower Brule fossils

As we continue our overview of Badlands fossils, the next unit above the Chadron Formation is the Scenic Member of the Brule Formation, which is Oligocene in age. If you just tabulate what fossils are present, the Scenic looks a lot like the Chadron. But that doesn’t reflect the differences in abundance, because the Scenic is all about the oreodonts.

Oreodonts were sheep-sized artiodactyls that were not particularly closely related to modern groups. They were present in the Chadron, but their diversity and particularly their abundance increases in the Scenic Member. Merycoidodon (top, from USNM) was particularly common. Miniochoerus (below, from SDSM) was also widespread, with several different species.

Other artiodactyls were also quite common, including the ruminant Leptomeryx (SDSM):

The camelid Poebrotherium (SDSM):

Some of the most spectacular artiodactyls were the omnivorous or carnivorous entelodonts, such as Archaeotherium (SDSM):

Other groups that saw tremendous increases in diversity were rodents such as Ischyromys and rabbits such as Palaeolagus (both SDSM):

Perissodactyls were still around, if not as common as artiodactyls. These included horses such as Mesohippus and rhinoceroses such as Hyracodon and Metamynodon (all SDSM):

Carnivores such as Hoplophoneus and Dinictis also continue into the Scenic Member (both SDSM):

So, other than the changes in relative abundance of certain groups, how exactly is the Scenic Member different from the Chadron Formation? Notably absent from the Scenic are titanotheres and alligators. The titanotheres disappear from North America all together at the end of the Chadron, and alligators are not seen in the White River Group again.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Badlands National Park, Part 4: lower Brule fossils

  1. Decker Chaney says:

    Hi Butch! I just wanted to point out a typo so you can fix it when you have time. You spelled “Perissodactyls” as “Preissodactyls”.
    Random thought, my computer actually recognized perissodactyl as a real word!

  2. George says:

    Bo\utch
    I have seen many picts of neat fossils from the badlands I never collected out there, however in the Calvert I found twoassociated titanothere teeth for some reason one landed in the Calvert Marinne Museum and the other in the SI. In my extensive screening of either early miocene or late oligocene deposits i did find a beaver incisor and a deer tooth that were donated to the SI. If you are up there sometime ask Dave Bohaska if he can locate it good luck since they have no staff maintaining the collections (thanks to idiots in senate congress and White house) it may take some time. Both probably non described species. In the Calvert group I have found peccary and in a beach tooth down at Westmoreland State Park I found a camel tooth probably from a pleistocene wash out.

    All the best George

  3. altondooley says:

    Thanks, Decker; should be fixed now.

    George, I think all of the Chesapeake Group is younger than any of the White River Group (although the Old Church is only a little younger). The Piney Point Fm is probably close to the same age as the Chadron Fm. It’s possible that Chadronian fossils could come from that unit and then get reworked into the Miocene units.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s