Strange mysticete periotic from Carmel Church

20130227-105503.jpg

Last year we began preparation of jackets containing “Popeye“, one of the baleen whales from Carmel Church. As with most of our Carmel Church jackets, there was a great deal of material that was not from “Popeye”, and we’ve been slowly sorting through those remains. A few weeks ago I cleaned up the fragment shown above, which turned out to be part of the periotic bone from a baleen whale.

I knew right away this was not “Popeye’s” periotic, simply because we’ve already recovered “Popeye’s” (and it’s still embedded in the skull, so there’s no doubt about its identity). Periotics are pretty distinctive in baleen whales, so I was hopeful that we could identify this one. That has turned out to be tougher than I thought, because this is a pretty strange periotic, at least compared to the ones I’m familiar with.

This is the left periotic, and the image at the top is in ventral view, with anterior more or less to the right. The posterior process is mostly missing; it should extend off to the left, but only the broken base is present. That base is the first oddity; it’s really long and slender compared to other Calvert Formation mysticetes,

The triangular structure near the middle of the bone is called the promontorium. It includes several openings for nerves that pass through the periotic. But this area is also pretty strange. The promontorium is really large compared to the rest of the bone, and the triangular shape is pretty odd. It’s also pushed over laterally (down in the image), so that the nerve foramina open more ventrally than medially. The promontorium is actually pushed over so far that it’s visible even in dorsal view (the long base of the posterior process is also really apparent in this view):

20130227-110932.jpg

Finally, while there’s a fairly large anterior process, it has essentially no medial or lateral projections. In most other Calvert mysticetes, at least one of the projections is usually very pronounced, and sometimes they both are. Aglaocetus is an exception, but Aglaocetus doesn’t have any of the other oddities present in this specimen.

So I’m stumped. I’ve not been able to find any described Calvert mysticete that matches this specimen. I’m looking further afield now, checking literature on mysticetes from other localities, but so far I haven’t been able to identify this intriguing specimen. If anyone has any ideas, please speak up in the comments.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Carmel Church mysticetes, Carmel Church Quarry, Chesapeake Group. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Strange mysticete periotic from Carmel Church

  1. George says:

    Butch

    Any possibility of Herpetocetus

  2. Boesse says:

    Have you compared it yet with the figures in Steeman (2010)?

    As Butch will attest, it’s not Herpetocetus for a couple reasons: 1) it doesn’t look like it and 2) Herpetocetus is really only Pliocene in age, aside from a couple of late Miocene localities in California (where it is barely into the Miocene).

    That is definitely a strange looking periotic, but in the Parietobalaena-Diorocetus-Aglaocetus “Kelloggithere” ballpark.

  3. altondooley says:

    I don’t think it’s Herpetocetus; it just really doesn’t look much like it. The long base of the posterior process alone probably rules it out.

    There are some similarities to Parietobalaena laxata as figured in Steeman, 2010, although I’m not at all convinced that P. laxata is really Parietobalaena. I could see both this specimen and P. laxata being in that general group though (Pelocetidae of Steeman).

  4. Indira Ritsche says:

    Hi. Looks like Parietobalaena campiniana (Bisconti 2013) and in general there are some similarities to Parietobalaena (Steeman 2010 and also Kellogg 1924 und 1968).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s